Rendered at 10:38:12 GMT+0000 (Coordinated Universal Time) with Cloudflare Workers.
Fizz43 3 minutes ago [-]
A lot of "left" creators were attacking the democrats coming up to 2024.
specproc 23 minutes ago [-]
A lot of the comments focus on the platform, which is certainly relevant but only part of the picture.
There is a huge industry around political communications, which for some time now has been intensely focused on social media. You throw enough money at these platforms in the right way, and your message comes out louder.
Lots gets done quietly, often outside of formal campaigns by aligned actors.
I think a big part of 24, terrible Democrat candidates aside, was the large quantities of very tech-savvy money flowing into Republican campaigns at the national and state levels.
I mean, it’s ran by Larry Ellison and the Saudis, so I don’t think this is surprising. But good research nonetheless.
CaptainNegative 9 hours ago [-]
Does he also run a time machine? He bought TikTok only earlier this year.
someotherperson 9 hours ago [-]
Worth mentioning that Oracle has been hosting US TikTok data since 2022.
7 hours ago [-]
throwawayffffas 8 hours ago [-]
Wasn't it run by the Chinese back then?
blindriver 9 hours ago [-]
Given the fact that the Republicans won, doesn't that actually make sense? More people consumed the pro-Republican content because they intended to vote Republican.
giarc 9 hours ago [-]
It's probably a bit more nuanced then that. You have to look at the people that use Tiktok... are they generally more left or right? I don't know the answer. I would have said they are younger and therefore more left leaning, however, I think that's becoming less and less true.
hallole 9 hours ago [-]
Good point, but the article does say
> "ideological imbalance occurs regardless of a user’s initial political interests"
But yeah, even in the absence of any kind of algorithmic bias, I'd still expect there to be an imbalance for the reason that you point out.
krapp 9 hours ago [-]
If it were the other way around people would be accusing the CCP of trying to rig the election for the Democrats, but sure. When it helps the Republicans I guess there's nothing to see here.
bediger4000 7 hours ago [-]
That's the media trying to remediate the "liberal bias" r that almost everyone believes, despite stories like this.
4ndrewl 4 hours ago [-]
That sounds like you're mixing up cause and effect?
outside1234 9 hours ago [-]
I mean I think we can expect that from the then Chinese and now Billionaires that own it
aaron695 7 hours ago [-]
[dead]
tonetheman 9 hours ago [-]
[dead]
throwawayffffas 11 hours ago [-]
[flagged]
clipsy 9 hours ago [-]
The party is named the "Democratic Party," not the "Democrat Party."
The slur stems from how the Democratic Party campaigns on democratic principles and helping the people, but when in elected they end up not delivering and instead protecting donors & corporate interests. They also do not act democratic. The Democratic Party rigged the 2016 primary so Bernie Sanders would lose to Hillary Clinton. Then in 2020 they rigged the primary again so Joe Biden would win against Bernie Sanders. Then in 2024, they rigged it again so Kamala Harris became Democratic nominee without winning the primary. All of this was done to protect donor & corporate interests.
The Republican party is the same, there's nothing republican about them.
rayiner 7 hours ago [-]
[flagged]
ineedasername 6 hours ago [-]
Algorithms like these typically have some foundation in the same type of vector embedding used elsewhere in AI, eg semantic and other qualities that map to overlapping or nearby latent space will drive suggested content. So, what typically trends on TikTok, goes viral, etc? Entertainment, emotional hooks.
In short, anti democratic content was, on average, more entertaining or emotion provoking.
That doesn't have to hold a deeper meaning on the value of any particular political viewpoint, or require tiktok's thumb on the scales of the algorithm to explain things. I'm not even saying TikTok didn't/doesn't do such things, but that type of interference isn't required to explain this trend.
concinds 2 hours ago [-]
Anything can be turned into emotion-provoking content. That's circular. It's like saying: "viral things go viral, so if you assume no thumb on the scale, then there was no thumb on the scale". Occam's Razor can hide fallacies, there's no reason to assume that the simplest hypothesis is that there was no thumb on the scale. Arguably it's the opposite.
a_ba 3 hours ago [-]
While I don’t think you’re wrong with respect to the mechanics of the algorithm favoring „engaging“ content. However at the same time I do think that they have the finger on the scales because the media company’s know full well what they’re serving. I bet there’s not a lot of pro democracy content trending on Chinese TikTok the same way anti democratic content is served in western TikTok
There is a huge industry around political communications, which for some time now has been intensely focused on social media. You throw enough money at these platforms in the right way, and your message comes out louder.
Lots gets done quietly, often outside of formal campaigns by aligned actors.
I think a big part of 24, terrible Democrat candidates aside, was the large quantities of very tech-savvy money flowing into Republican campaigns at the national and state levels.
All this stuff can be and is bought.
> "ideological imbalance occurs regardless of a user’s initial political interests"
But yeah, even in the absence of any kind of algorithmic bias, I'd still expect there to be an imbalance for the reason that you point out.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Democratic_Party_(United_State...
The slur stems from how the Democratic Party campaigns on democratic principles and helping the people, but when in elected they end up not delivering and instead protecting donors & corporate interests. They also do not act democratic. The Democratic Party rigged the 2016 primary so Bernie Sanders would lose to Hillary Clinton. Then in 2020 they rigged the primary again so Joe Biden would win against Bernie Sanders. Then in 2024, they rigged it again so Kamala Harris became Democratic nominee without winning the primary. All of this was done to protect donor & corporate interests.
The Republican party is the same, there's nothing republican about them.
In short, anti democratic content was, on average, more entertaining or emotion provoking.
That doesn't have to hold a deeper meaning on the value of any particular political viewpoint, or require tiktok's thumb on the scales of the algorithm to explain things. I'm not even saying TikTok didn't/doesn't do such things, but that type of interference isn't required to explain this trend.